{"id":754,"date":"2010-09-28T07:22:02","date_gmt":"2010-09-28T14:22:02","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.clarkjudge.org\/?p=754"},"modified":"2010-09-28T07:23:26","modified_gmt":"2010-09-28T14:23:26","slug":"pledge-to-fight-hughhewitt-com-09-27-10","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.clarkjudge.org\/wordpress\/2010\/09\/28\/pledge-to-fight-hughhewitt-com-09-27-10\/","title":{"rendered":"Pledge to Fight | HughHewitt.com | 09.27.10"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The House GOP Pledge to America was unveiled last week. \u00a0The Pledge was  intended as a reprise to the 1994 Contract with America. \u00a0The response  to it has been surreal.<\/p>\n<p>First have been the retorts from the Democrats. \u00a0\u201cWarmed over.\u201d  \u00a0\u201cNothing new here.\u201d \u00a0You\u2019ve heard it all. \u00a0And you\u2019ve seen the  mainstream media following behind like trained dogs, which, to a large  extent they are.<\/p>\n<p>You might have expected the MSM to ask, didn\u2019t the President and the  Democratic leadership in Congress bolster their case for the widely  reviled Obamacare legislation saying that it had first been proposed by  Theodore Roosevelt, next by Harry Truman, last by Bill Clinton? \u00a0If  that\u2019s not warmed over, what is? \u00a0And if you, the MSM, get all tingly  about warmed over Obamacare, why do you dismiss tax cuts, reduced and  predictable regulation, and control of spending as warmed over?<\/p>\n<p>We know the answer, of course. \u00a0In Democrat and MSM world, more  spending, more taxing of entrepreneurs and investors, more capricious  regulation: these all qualify as bold and new &#8212; no matter how many  times they are trotted out. \u00a0And no matter how disastrous the results,  they qualify as visionary and making things better than they would have  been otherwise.<\/p>\n<p>And we know the flip side that the MSM directs at Republicans. \u00a0How can  you afford the current lower taxes? \u00a0How can you cut taxes and balance  the budget?<\/p>\n<p>Aren\u2019t the right questions, how can you afford all that spending? \u00a0And  regarding taxation, how can we afford a stagnate economy? \u00a0And in a  world driven by entrepreneurship, how can we afford to tax entrepreneurs  into financial impotence? \u00a0How can we throw paralyzing regulations at  all areas of business?<\/p>\n<p>And wouldn\u2019t it be worth a moment of the MSM noting that the totality of  the administration\u2019s program of the last two years may well have the  long-term effect of suffocating the private economy even as it puts on  steroids the public sector. \u00a0Is such a policy sustainable?<\/p>\n<p>I am dreaming, of course. \u00a0The MSM would never think to ask such  questions. \u00a0 So on Sunday\u2019s Meet the Press, for example, David Gregory  badgered, belittled, and spoke over again and again Congressman Mike  Pence, but let Democrat Chris Van Hollen run on uninterrupted.<\/p>\n<p>Meanwhile, reaction to the Pledge on the conservative side has been  mixed, to put it mildly. \u00a0On a Friday podcast on the Ricochet website (<a href=\"http:\/\/ricochet.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">http:\/\/ricochet.com<\/a>), Andrew Breitbart declined to take sides, as the crossfire had been  so ferocious between the Power Line and the Red State blogs. \u00a0 You know  things are contentious when Andrew Breitbart declines to wade in.<\/p>\n<p>To me the Pledge says several things:<\/p>\n<p>First, most of the House GOP leadership and many of the members have  heard clearly the discontent with the spending run-ups of 2000-2006.  \u00a0There appear to be holdouts. \u00a0A good indicator of a holdout would be  service on the appropriations committee.<\/p>\n<p>I have heard from Capitol Hill insiders that this group poses a  particular problem to reformers. \u00a0Dedication to the ways of the  appropriators was a major factor in Utah Senator Robert Bennett\u2019s  failure to win renomination. \u00a0Congressman Jerry Lewis\u2019 reported  resistance to some parts of the Pledge and particularly to including a  blanket rejection of earmarks is indicative of this problem. \u00a0Lewis is  slated to assume chairmanship of the committee, should the GOP take over  the House.<\/p>\n<p>Second, the Pledge includes repealing Obamacare, freezing all unspent  stimulus dollars, and taking spending back to 2008 levels. \u00a0All are  excellent. \u00a0Any action on these lines will draw a presidential veto.  \u00a0Unless the House and Senate become overwhelmingly GOP, enough to scare  Democrats to going along, an override will, at least initially, be out  of the question. \u00a0Look for a government shutdown, which, for the  Republicans, would not be a bad thing, actually.<\/p>\n<p>The GOP\u2019s sin in the government shutdown of 1995 was that it caved so  quickly. \u00a0Uncertain of public support, the GOP congressional leaders of  the time took the Clinton administration\u2019s first offer and were judged  the losers in the standoff.<\/p>\n<p>Given current polls, the Republicans would enjoy broad public support in  a repeat match, even as the MSM pummeled them. \u00a0But the media is no  longer a monolith and it is a fair bet that, to the degree that the old  mainstream media followed their traditional \u201cyes, master\u201d tag along  after the Democrats, the MSM would see their already cratering audiences  fall faster.<\/p>\n<p>So the Pledge comes down to this: It is a Pledge that the Republicans  will fight and fight hard in the next Congress. \u00a0They won\u2019t give in as  they did in the mid-90s. \u00a0They won\u2019t go to the dark side of spending as  they did in the 2000-2006.<\/p>\n<p>In the political world the next Congress will face, such a pledge is serious and real.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The House GOP Pledge to America was unveiled last week. \u00a0The Pledge was intended as a reprise to the 1994 Contract with America. \u00a0The response to it has been surreal. First have been the retorts from the Democrats. \u00a0\u201cWarmed over.\u201d \u00a0\u201cNothing new here.\u201d \u00a0You\u2019ve heard it all. \u00a0And you\u2019ve seen the mainstream media following behind [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[12],"class_list":["post-754","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-political-commentary-general","tag-hugh-hewitt"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.clarkjudge.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/754","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.clarkjudge.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.clarkjudge.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.clarkjudge.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.clarkjudge.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=754"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.clarkjudge.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/754\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":756,"href":"https:\/\/www.clarkjudge.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/754\/revisions\/756"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.clarkjudge.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=754"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.clarkjudge.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=754"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.clarkjudge.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=754"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}