Last week a senior Washington political journalist told me this story.<\/p>\n
According to the journalist\u2019s inside-the-administration sources, a memo went from the Obamacare website developers to the White House several months ago.\u00a0 It laid out in detail the problems with the now-infamous website and recommended \u2013 maybe begged is closer to it \u2013 the launch\u2019s delay.\u00a0 Otherwise, they said, the website was sure to fail.<\/p>\n
Sounds familiar, yes?\u00a0 Here is the twist.\u00a0 The memo was returned to the sender with a one-sentence note scrawled on the top.\u00a0 The note was from senior presidential advisor (who some consider the shadow president) Valery Jarrett.\u00a0 It read, \u201cFailure is not an option.\u201d<\/p>\n
That one sentence \u2013 \u201cFailure is not an option\u201d \u2013 written shortly before the launch of such a hugely complex and sensitive project as the Obamacare website highlights the mix of Greek-tragedy-proportioned hubris and almost adolescent naivety that lies behind the unfolding Obamacare fiasco.<\/p>\n
The White House seems to believe that with power all things are possible: We say it (snap of the fingers); it is done.<\/p>\n
Throw the vast resources of the federal government at an issue \u2013 any issue \u2013 and, voila, solution.<\/p>\n
Companies \u2014 the White House crowd seems to believe \u2014 are moved only by greed and so will not serve people\u2019s needs.\u00a0 Private enterprises have the wrong will and, let\u2019s be honest now, insufficient resources.\u00a0 All big tasks \u2013 all tasks that matter \u2013 belong in the government.<\/p>\n
The Obama people show no sense that, unlike the government, companies fail if they fail their customers.\u00a0 Or that delivering \u201cworld-class service\u201d \u2013 as the president once promised of the Obamacare website experience \u2013 is a hard task.\u00a0 It looks easy, because Amazon, American Express, Land\u2019s End and so many others worked so hard and so long to get it right<\/p>\n
But behind each successful site is years of tinkering, testing, and revision, in small steps that usually begin with comparatively simple, small sites and build from there.\u00a0 The learning is not just on the part of contractors but within large sections of the companies themselves.\u00a0 Anyone with an iPad can tell from all the app revisions how constant and consuming this process must be.<\/p>\n
Anyone can see it, except, it seems, the senior staff of this hubris-blinded White House.<\/p>\n
To be clear, I am not talking about the president\u2019s famous declaration, \u201cIf you want to keep you insurance, you can keep it.\u201d\u00a0 In that case, the president was talking about a formal feature of the health care law.\u00a0 When it came to how that law was designed, the president and the lawyers, counselors and economists around him were the equivalent of the website developers.\u00a0 They knew that what they were promising could not happen.\u00a0 But when they sent their memo up the chain of command (that would be to the American people, including you and me), they did exactly the opposite of what the designers of their program\u2019s website did.<\/p>\n
Maybe even the Nancy Pelosi-types who passed the legislation so they could find out what was in it knew more than they were letting on, too.\u00a0 But if Pelosi and her miserable minions in the House Democratic Caucus and co-conspirators in the Senate Democratic Caucus didn\u2019t actually know that the White House was lying, it would have been out of willful ignorance. \u00a0There is not a clean pair of Democratic hands in official Washington, today.<\/p>\n
But no, the hubris and naivety I am talking about is the snap-the-fingers mindset.<\/p>\n
We saw this mindset in action last week with the change in the Senate rule on the limits of debate.\u00a0 It was George Washington who said that the Senate was to be like the saucer of a coffee cup, where the hot liquid of legislation would sit for a while to cool down.<\/p>\n
But the Senate filibuster was getting in the way of packing a pivotally placed court. The Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit deals with regulatory agencies, that is, with the administrative state.\u00a0 Think EPA on coal, Dodd-Frank and the financial sector or the regulatory mountain generated by the Affordable Care Act.\u00a0 The court has leaned strongly toward the view that law by decree is not law, despite what the administration says \u2014 hence the desire to pack it.<\/p>\n
Hubris, naivety, will to power, snap-the-fingers view of government: those who created our Constitution knew what evil lurks in the hearts of men \u2013 what folly, too.\u00a0 They designed a system of limited government and checks and balances to contain it.\u00a0 For decades the liberal\u2026 or progressive\u2026 or modern (whatever you choose to call them) forces have little by little compromised that system.<\/p>\n
When does compromise become destruction?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Last week a senior Washington political journalist told me this story. According to the journalist\u2019s inside-the-administration sources, a memo went from the Obamacare website developers to the White House several months ago.\u00a0 It laid out in detail the problems with the now-infamous website and recommended \u2013 maybe begged is closer to it \u2013 the launch\u2019s […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[34],"tags":[12,60,64],"class_list":["post-1685","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-economic-policy-health-care","tag-hugh-hewitt","tag-obama","tag-obamacare"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.clarkjudge.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1685","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.clarkjudge.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.clarkjudge.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.clarkjudge.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.clarkjudge.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1685"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.clarkjudge.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1685\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1688,"href":"https:\/\/www.clarkjudge.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1685\/revisions\/1688"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.clarkjudge.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1685"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.clarkjudge.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1685"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.clarkjudge.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1685"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}