{"id":1598,"date":"2013-06-26T13:01:35","date_gmt":"2013-06-26T20:01:35","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.clarkjudge.org\/?p=1598"},"modified":"2013-06-26T13:01:35","modified_gmt":"2013-06-26T20:01:35","slug":"president-embraces-flat-earth-science-and-economics-hughhewitt-com-06-26-13","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.clarkjudge.org\/wordpress\/2013\/06\/26\/president-embraces-flat-earth-science-and-economics-hughhewitt-com-06-26-13\/","title":{"rendered":"President Embraces Flat Earth Science\u2026 and Economics | HughHewitt.com | 06.26.13"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Yesterday President Obama joined the Flat Earth Society.<\/p>\n<p>That\u2019s not how he put it, of course. \u00a0Just the opposite. \u00a0He said, \u201cWe don\u2019t have time for a meeting of the Flat Earth Society,\u201d i.e. those not prepared to join him in embracing radical anti-fossil fuel policies.<\/p>\n<p>Put another way, he meant forget about Congress. \u00a0Congress has repeatedly rejected legislation to authorize what Mr. Obama announced yesterday he would do anyway, essentially by decree. \u00a0For example, the administration backed a cap and trade bill in 2010. \u00a0Designed to limit the use of coal and oil, it was so unpopular in that year\u2019s overwhelmingly\u00a0<i>Democratic<\/i>\u00a0Congress that Majority Leader Harry Reid ultimately withdrew it. \u00a0The issue was not overcoming a filibuster. \u00a0Reid knew that the bill would have lost an up and down vote on the Senate floor.<\/p>\n<p>Of course, the president was also saying that opponents of anti-climate change legislation are so ignorant of science that they aren\u2019t worth talking to. \u00a0Who is the truly ignorant one?<\/p>\n<p>Hasn\u2019t anyone told the president that the average global temperature has not increased in fifteen years? \u00a0As Pacific Research Institute senior fellow Steven Hayward reported recently in\u00a0<i>The Weekly Standard<\/i>:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>After two decades of steady and substantial global temperature increase from 1980 to 1998, the pause in warming is causing a crisis for the climate crusade. It wasn\u2019t supposed to happen like this. The recent temperature record is falling distinctly to the very low end of the range predicted by the climate models and may soon fall out of it, which means the models are wrong, or, at the very least, something is going on that supposedly \u201csettled\u201d science hasn\u2019t been able to settle. (full article at:<a href=\"http:\/\/www.weeklystandard.com\/articles\/climate-circus-leaves-town_718070.html)\" target=\"_blank\">http:\/\/www.weeklystandard.com\/articles\/climate-circus-leaves-town_718070.html)<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/blockquote>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>Just last week, Germany\u2019s\u00a0<i>Spiegle Online International<\/i>\u00a0posted an interview with Hans von Storch, professor at the Meteorological Institute of the University of Hamburg\u00a0and among Germany\u2019s most renowned climate scientist.\u00a0Storch said:<em id=\"__mceDel\">\u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>If things continue as they have been, in five years, at the latest, we will need to acknowledge that something is fundamentally wrong with our climate models. A 20-year pause in global warming does not occur in a single modeled scenario. But even today, we are finding it very difficult to reconcile actual temperature trends with our expectations. (full interview here:\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.spiegel.de\/international\/world\/interview-hans-von-storch-on-problems-with-climate-change-models-a-906721.html)\" target=\"_blank\">http:\/\/www.spiegel.de\/international\/world\/interview-hans-von-storch-on-problems-with-climate-change-models-a-906721.html)<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/blockquote>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>Recently I reviewed a new book on climate change (see here:\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/spectator.org\/archives\/2013\/06\/13\/overheated-frauds-and-fools).\" target=\"_blank\">http:\/\/spectator.org\/archives\/2013\/06\/13\/overheated-frauds-and-fools).<\/a>\u00a0\u00a0Titled\u00a0<i>The Age of Global Warming: A History<\/i>, it was written by British policy intellectual Rupert Darwall. Darwall helped found the major British think tank Reform. \u00a0He is also affiliated with the firm I head. \u00a0Reading him it is clear that the scientific underpinnings of the global warming theory were always shaky.<\/p>\n<p>The critical \u201cevidence\u201d of catastrophic trends turns out to have been neither repeatable experiments nor hard data but computer models. \u00a0As noted by one University of Cambridge physicist and investigator of the notorious University of East Anglia \u201cclimategate\u201d scandal, the characterization of computer runs as experiments \u2013 the norm in the climate change community \u2014 \u201cdoes a disservice to centuries of real experimentation and allows simulations output to be considered as real data\u2026a very serious matter, as it can lead to the idea that \u2018real data\u2019 might be wrong because it disagrees with models!\u201d He added, \u201cThat is turning centuries of science on its head.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The president alluded yesterday to economic damage that had resulted from not taking drastic actions against climate change already. Perhaps he was referring to the British government\u2019s 2006 Stern Report. The report concluded that failure to act against global warming \u201ccould create economic and social disruption on a scale associated with the First and Second World Wars and the Great Depression of the 1930s.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>But that globally influential report turns out to have been perhaps the most inept \u2013 or disingenuous \u2014 policy study by a major government in modern history. \u00a0As I noted in the review, to reach its conclusion, the bureaucrats involved had simply ignored basic rules of economic analysis, counting costs in the nearly infinite future as if they were being faced today. So more than half the damages it attributed to global warming came after\u2026 2050? (No). \u00a02100? (No). \u00a02200? (No). Try after 2800.<\/p>\n<p>All of this wouldn\u2019t be so bad \u2014 politicians, like children, will play \u2013 except for the consequences. \u00a0Fracking, the Keystone pipeline and coal technology are promising North America true net energy independence within the decade, arguably the single greatest step we could take to ensuring long-term global peace and domestic prosperity. \u00a0Apparently all that is to be thrown out the window, assuming the president has his way.<\/p>\n<p>Which just goes to show, in this administration flat earth thinking doesn\u2019t stop at science.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Yesterday President Obama joined the Flat Earth Society. That\u2019s not how he put it, of course. \u00a0Just the opposite. \u00a0He said, \u201cWe don\u2019t have time for a meeting of the Flat Earth Society,\u201d i.e. those not prepared to join him in embracing radical anti-fossil fuel policies. Put another way, he meant forget about Congress. \u00a0Congress [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[94,160,169,60],"class_list":["post-1598","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-economic-policy-general","tag-economy","tag-global-warming","tag-hughhewit","tag-obama"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.clarkjudge.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1598","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.clarkjudge.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.clarkjudge.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.clarkjudge.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.clarkjudge.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1598"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.clarkjudge.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1598\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1599,"href":"https:\/\/www.clarkjudge.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1598\/revisions\/1599"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.clarkjudge.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1598"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.clarkjudge.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1598"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.clarkjudge.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1598"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}