With the Iowa caucuses a week away, uneasiness pervades GOP circles in Washington and around the country.<\/p>\n
Part of the reason \u2013 but only part \u2013 stems from continuing disquiet about the field of candidates.<\/p>\n
\u201cMitt or Newt,\u201d I was asked at a holiday party of longtime conservatives and activists last night. \u00a0No matter how I replied everyone groaned. \u00a0It turned out that in the minds of this group of political veterans there was no right answer.<\/p>\n
Anxiety about whether former House Speaker Newt Gingrich has the temperament for the job \u2013 including whether he has the organizational skill to run a national scale political organization \u2013 wasn\u2019t helped by the Christmas Eve announcement that he had missed Virginia\u2019s primary filing deadline. \u00a0Meanwhile, comments that former Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney has failed to articulate a story \u2013 a narrative of the nation\u2019s past and present and the choices and prospects for its future \u2013 brought vigorous nods.<\/p>\n
How about the rest of the field? \u00a0None figured as serious contenders in the minds of these pros. \u00a0Ron Paul was dismissed as the next Huckabee, possible winner of Iowa but nothing else. \u00a0Santorum? \u00a0\u201cLooks beaten,\u201d one said. \u00a0Huntsman, Bachmann, and Perry were all judged deservedly out of the running.<\/p>\n
Last night\u2019s gathering was of Washington insiders, but the attitudes and anxieties were the same I have been hearing around the nation. \u00a0No one feels settled about the field. There were even press reports last week of major donors exploring whether it was too late for a new candidate to jump in.<\/p>\n
But more than a lack of confidence in the choices explains these holiday blues. \u00a0There is also the math of getting from here (national crisis under this president) to there (a GOP president ready to mount a rescue).<\/p>\n
Here are some sobering electoral numbers.<\/p>\n
In our five presidential elections beginning with Bill Clinton\u2019s 1992 defeat of George H.W. Bush, the Democrats have won eighteen states and the District of Columbia every time. \u00a0That is 242 electoral votes of 270 needed to win. \u00a0The GOP starts with only 176 secure electoral-college ballots in 21 states. \u00a0The decision will turn on the remaining eleven states: Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico, North Carolina, Iowa, Missouri, New Hampshire, Ohio, Florida, Virginia, and West Virginia. \u00a0It is a gift to the GOP to call Colorado, New Mexico and Nevada toss ups. They have very strong Democratic tendencies. \u00a0And last week, a widely noted poll came out showing that attitudes of Virginia voters towards the president are much more favorable than anyone guessed. \u00a0Win those four states \u2013 Colorado, New Mexico, Nevada and Virginia — and Mr. Obama snags a second term.<\/p>\n
If that doesn\u2019t dampen your holiday cheer, consider this tidbit. \u00a0You may have heard it. \u00a0There is a good chance the primaries will not produce a candidate.<\/p>\n
Throughout the primary-dominated period in presidential nominating that began in the late 1960s, national political conventions have been largely media affairs. \u00a0Expertly staged for television, each party\u2019s once-in-four-years meetings have become marathon infomercials. \u00a0They just sell candidates and platforms rather than Cuisinarts, costume jewelry, and knives.<\/p>\n
But don\u2019t count on this being the case at the GOP\u2019s Tampa convocation in August. \u00a0For unlike years past, many state delegations will not be selected on a winner-take-all basis. \u00a0The reason? Last year the party adopted the following rule: \u201cAny presidential primary, caucus, convention, or other meeting held for the purpose of selecting delegates to the national convention… shall provide for the allocation of delegates on a proportional basis.\u201d<\/p>\n
The mechanics of how the apportionment will work remain a bit fuzzy, as is the exact list of states the may be exempted from the rule. \u00a0I am guessing that state parties retain a say in the manner by which the resolution is put into effect (congressional district take all, for example, versus proportion of votes cast statewide). \u00a0And states that hold their primaries after April 1st apparently may opt for winner take all. \u00a0But whatever the details, here is the underlying fact: with two candidates (Gingrich and Romney) appearing to each have a secure thirty percent of GOP voters behind them and the rest of the field splitting the remaining third (all of whom are sticking with their candidates, at least for the moment), it is easy to envision a similar division among the delegates in Tampa.<\/p>\n
In other words, forget about the informercial. \u00a0We\u2019re talking a WWF-style smackdown and who knows how that might play with the public.<\/p>\n
Happy New Year.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
With the Iowa caucuses a week away, uneasiness pervades GOP circles in Washington and around the country. Part of the reason \u2013 but only part \u2013 stems from continuing disquiet about the field of candidates. \u201cMitt or Newt,\u201d I was asked at a holiday party of longtime conservatives and activists last night. \u00a0No matter how […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[51,52,54,50,53,55],"class_list":["post-1077","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-political-commentary-general","tag-51","tag-campaign","tag-gingrich","tag-gop","tag-republican-nominee","tag-romney"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.clarkjudge.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1077","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.clarkjudge.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.clarkjudge.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.clarkjudge.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.clarkjudge.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1077"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.clarkjudge.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1077\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1084,"href":"https:\/\/www.clarkjudge.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1077\/revisions\/1084"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.clarkjudge.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1077"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.clarkjudge.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1077"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.clarkjudge.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1077"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}