-
Recent Posts
- Coming: Global Political Recalibration
- Clark Judge: FDR, Reagan, and European Nationalism | NatCon Rome 2020
- Lady Gaga Tells All
- Trial Lawyers Use COVID-19 to Prey on America’s Corporations | Real Clear Policy | 12.1.20
- Trump’s Nomination of ACB Honors Constitutional Norms; Dems Dishonor Them | American Greatness | 9.27.20
Categories
- Book Reviews (12)
- Communication Strategy (23)
- Constitution and Law (14)
- Economic Policy: General (33)
- Economic Policy: Health Care (30)
- Economic Policy: The Great Financial Crisis (15)
- Economic Policy: US Debt Crisis (32)
- Education Policy (1)
- Global Issues (57)
- Political Commentary: Campaign 2008 (18)
- Political Commentary: Campaign 2012 (43)
- Political Commentary: Campaign 2020 (4)
- Political Commentary: General (122)
- Politics & Policy (6)
- Ronald Reagan and the Reagan Administration (11)
- Speeches/Lectures (9)
- Uncategorized (6)
Archives
- March 2023
- July 2022
- April 2022
- December 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- November 2019
- December 2018
- September 2017
- April 2017
- January 2017
- October 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- June 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- January 2008
- June 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- June 2006
- October 2005
- August 2005
- March 2005
- November 2004
- August 2004
- June 2004
- December 2003
- October 2003
- August 2003
- April 2003
- July 2002
- December 2001
- November 2001
- May 2001
- December 2000
- June 2000
- January 1995
- August 1994
- August 1992
- June 1991
- July 1990
- September 1989
- July 1989
- March 1989
Tags
2012 2012 election Benghazi campaign constitution debt debt crisis Democrats economy election 2012 Energy Financial Times fiscal cliff foreign policy Gingrich Global Warming GOP Hoover Digest hughhewitt HughHewitt.com Immigration IRS National Review New York Post New York Times Obama Obamacare Republicans Ricochet Ricochet.com Romney Russia Scandal Senate SOTU speech Supreme Court Syria Tea Party Trump U.S. News Ukraine Wall Street Journal war Washington Times
Putting Odds on the 2012 Presidential Race | HughHewitt.com | 04.04.11
This past week, in Washington and around the country, Republican activists have been having a collective anxiety attack. Everywhere you go, you hear doubts that no likely candidate has what it takes to beat Mr. Obama. Following are two ways – polls and electoral votes — of assessing this worry.
Polls
Nearly as I can determine, pollster Kellyanne Conway was the first public opinion expert to spot alienation in a sizable segment of the 2004 Bush vote over the run-ups in federal spending. I first heard her discuss the finding in June 2005. This spending-driven swing came to define the 2006, 2008, and 2010 elections. Yet it was more than a year after that 2005 lecture that I encountered any other opinion surveyor identifying the trend or its cause.
This past week I asked Conway to tell me something about the groups that shifted from Democrat to Republican between 2008 and 2010 and what they might indicate for the 2012 presidential race. I did not want a repetition of what we have all heard about Independent voters. Could she turn the glass and refract the light in a different way?
Conway replied that four groups swung toward the GOP this past year: women, the working class (under <$50,000/year in income), rural America, and Millennials (18-29 year olds).
The long-standing female voter preference for Democrats disappeared in 2010, she said. The Democrats had won women by 12-14 percentage points in 2006 and 2008. In 2010, the GOP all but tied them. Why? Women reacted with revulsion to the bailouts, the stimulus, and the healthcare overhaul.
While unmarried women remained a GOP problem, they moved from about 70 percent Democratic to 60 percent between the last two elections. When asked last year about what they were “most upset about … in Washington,” unmarried female voters replied: too much party bickering (55%), too much spending, taxes, and deficits (32%), too much for the rich and Wall Street, not regular people (24%), too liberal (21%).
Conway said that we see similar shifts among the other groups she fingered. The GOP won the white working class in 2008 by ten points, in 2010 by 30. Rural America went from a 2008 Obama-McCain tie to a 2010 61%-36% GOP win. And among Millennials the Republican share grew from 32 percent for McCain to 42 percent for GOP candidates last year.
It is hard not to conclude from all these numbers that if the GOP remains the party of serious spending cuts, it will win big in 2012. Democratic appeals for saving this or that program – like Harry Reid’s recent defense of federal dollars for Cowboy poetry festivals – are likely to make things worse for the Dems, not better.
But the GOP still has plenty of room for overplaying its hand. Becoming the party of partisan bickering is one way. Allowing cuts in spending and taxes to be positioned not as helping all of us (essential for restoring the economy and the government’s financial health) is another. Still, looking at these numbers today, you’d rather be a Republican than a Democrat.
Electoral Votes
On Friday, I received the following analysis from Hoover Institution fellow Peter Robinson, who got it from Bill Whalen, another Hoover fellow. Whalen asked how would a Daniels-Rubio ticket in particular run against an Obama-Biden one (though any Midwestern GOP governor could take Daniels’ place, particularly Ohio’s John Kasich).
Whalen starts with the 2008 totals in the Electoral College: 365, Obama-Biden; 173 McCain-Palin. After post-census shifts, those numbers become 359-179.
Then he assumes that, like horses returning to their barn, Virginia and North Carolina go back into the GOP column – 337-201.
He also assumes that Daniels (or another Midwestern governor) would carry Ohio and Indiana, both 2008 GOP losses – 306-232.
Nevada, Colorado, and New Mexico have big Hispanic populations. He believes putting Rubio on the ticket would be enough to pull them over – 292-246.
And of course Rubio brings Florida: 265-273, Republicans win.
Looks good for the GOP, huh? Yes, but…. If I were on Team Obama, I’d see Colorado, New Mexico, and Nevada as my firewall. As Conway pointed out, minority voters are not moving the way of other segments. So with this scenario, for the first time since 2000, the axis on which the presidential election turns could move west in 2012, from the Eastern Line (linking Ohio and Florida) to the Western Triangle (Nevada-Colorado-New Mexico).
In other words, as of today, Republicans have good reason for both optimism and anxiety. What’s the prognosis for 2012? It’s going to be a hard race, for both sides.