-
Recent Posts
- Coming: Global Political Recalibration
- Clark Judge: FDR, Reagan, and European Nationalism | NatCon Rome 2020
- Lady Gaga Tells All
- Trial Lawyers Use COVID-19 to Prey on America’s Corporations | Real Clear Policy | 12.1.20
- Trump’s Nomination of ACB Honors Constitutional Norms; Dems Dishonor Them | American Greatness | 9.27.20
Categories
- Book Reviews (12)
- Communication Strategy (23)
- Constitution and Law (14)
- Economic Policy: General (33)
- Economic Policy: Health Care (30)
- Economic Policy: The Great Financial Crisis (15)
- Economic Policy: US Debt Crisis (32)
- Education Policy (1)
- Global Issues (57)
- Political Commentary: Campaign 2008 (18)
- Political Commentary: Campaign 2012 (43)
- Political Commentary: Campaign 2020 (4)
- Political Commentary: General (122)
- Politics & Policy (6)
- Ronald Reagan and the Reagan Administration (11)
- Speeches/Lectures (9)
- Uncategorized (6)
Archives
- March 2023
- July 2022
- April 2022
- December 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- November 2019
- December 2018
- September 2017
- April 2017
- January 2017
- October 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- June 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- January 2008
- June 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- June 2006
- October 2005
- August 2005
- March 2005
- November 2004
- August 2004
- June 2004
- December 2003
- October 2003
- August 2003
- April 2003
- July 2002
- December 2001
- November 2001
- May 2001
- December 2000
- June 2000
- January 1995
- August 1994
- August 1992
- June 1991
- July 1990
- September 1989
- July 1989
- March 1989
Tags
2012 2012 election Benghazi campaign constitution debt debt crisis Democrats economy election 2012 Energy Financial Times fiscal cliff foreign policy Gingrich Global Warming GOP Hoover Digest hughhewitt HughHewitt.com Immigration IRS National Review New York Post New York Times Obama Obamacare Republicans Ricochet Ricochet.com Romney Russia Scandal Senate SOTU speech Supreme Court Syria Tea Party Trump U.S. News Ukraine Wall Street Journal war Washington Times
Election Outlook on Labor Day: A Veto-Proof Senate or Even a Congress? | HughHewitt.com | 09.06.10
It is Labor Day, beginning of the final phase of the 2010 midterm congressional campaign. A quick look at the polling tells a surprising story: Washington has utterly failed to grasp how much may change after November 2nd.
We have all heard about the incredible deterioration of the Democratic Party’s approval numbers on all fronts in recent months. Sunday’s New York Times reported that the Democratic high command would end financial support to some of their congressional candidates immediately after Labor Day. Considering the Democrats have raised three campaign dollars for every two of the GOP and traditionally receive vast uncounted resources from organized labor and their other constituency groups, this move points to a meltdown so massive that even this fabulously financed party is running out of funds trying to turn it back.
There has also been talk that Democratic candidates would run on cutting spending. After jamming through Congress a string of trillion-dollar bills including the widely reviled Obamacare, this sounds like an updated version of the old joke about the boy who killed his parents, then pleaded for the court’s mercy because he was an orphan.
Despite these desperate tactics, it is a fair bet that every GOP House seat that switched hands in the 2006 or 2008 elections will go back in November, a 54 vote shift.
But what about the Senate? Though pundits have not focused on it, the Senate may turn out to be an even bigger story than the House. Until recently the professional poll watchers scoffed at the idea of a GOP majority in the smaller body. Look again.
As of the most recent Rasmussen polls, four Senate races for seats that Democrats currently hold show double digit Republican leads (Delaware, Indiana, North Dakota and Arkansas). Another has a single digit GOP lead outside the margin of error and holding steady (Pennsylvania).
Six other such races are effectively tied, with the spread between the candidates inside the margin of polling error (Illinois, California, Colorado, Nevada, Washington, and Wisconsin). In a final race (West Virginia), the six percent spread exceeds the margin of error, but the Republican has cut the gap by ten percentage points since late July. With the possible exception of Nevada, the Republican candidate appears to have the momentum in each of these seven races.
It is unlikely that any GOP senator will lose to a Democrat this fall. So national alarm at the Obama-Reid-Pelosi government being what it is, the Republicans could pick up a net of twelve Senate seats. There is already talk in Washington of Connecticut senator Joseph Lieberman, an independent who currently caucuses with the Democrats, switching his caucus if the GOP wins a Senate majority. In other words, the GOP could come out of November counting 54 votes in its Senate camp.
The story doesn’t end there. Top items on the Republican agenda in the next Congress must include putting on the table repeal of Obamacare and replacing it with a market-driven alternative, stopping the spending of unspent stimulus dollars, and renewal of the Bush tax cuts, perhaps moving toward a flat tax, too.
With a fifty-four member caucus, the GOP would have a reasonable shot of mustering from within its own ranks and from among Democrats on the ballot in 2012 the 60 votes needed to break filibusters against this agenda. But could it override the inevitable presidential vetoes?
First, who might help Republicans break filibusters beginning in January? Look at the Senate class of 2012.
The list of Democrats up for reelection will include Tom Carper of Delaware, Bill Nelson of Florida, Claire McCaskill of Missouri, Jim Webb of Virginia, Ben Nelson of Nebraska, and Kent Conrad of North Dakota. All are from states where dismay over the Obama administration is intense. With skillful GOP leadership (and in the history of the party, Senate Republicans may never have had a more skillful leader than the current one, Mitch McConnell) getting to 60 isn’t impossible on key votes.
Yes, President Obama will still wield a veto. But governing by veto is impossible, especially as the country clamors for a return from hard left direction the past two years have brought. I count six, maybe seven Democratic senators in the class up in 2014 from states as conservative as those above. On defining tax and spending issues, some overrides may prove doable.
Does this mean that the GOP will be able to enact an agenda outright in 2011? Not really. Such ambitions will have to wait for 2013. But getting back to a majority will require showing – as one long-time House Republican said to me this week –“the specificity and passion that our people are looking for”.
If Republican House candidates can find that specificity and passion in the next nine weeks, the 2010 election could turn out to be among the most pivotal in American history.