-
Recent Posts
- Coming: Global Political Recalibration
- Clark Judge: FDR, Reagan, and European Nationalism | NatCon Rome 2020
- Lady Gaga Tells All
- Trial Lawyers Use COVID-19 to Prey on America’s Corporations | Real Clear Policy | 12.1.20
- Trump’s Nomination of ACB Honors Constitutional Norms; Dems Dishonor Them | American Greatness | 9.27.20
Categories
- Book Reviews (12)
- Communication Strategy (23)
- Constitution and Law (14)
- Economic Policy: General (33)
- Economic Policy: Health Care (30)
- Economic Policy: The Great Financial Crisis (15)
- Economic Policy: US Debt Crisis (32)
- Education Policy (1)
- Global Issues (57)
- Political Commentary: Campaign 2008 (18)
- Political Commentary: Campaign 2012 (43)
- Political Commentary: Campaign 2020 (4)
- Political Commentary: General (122)
- Politics & Policy (6)
- Ronald Reagan and the Reagan Administration (11)
- Speeches/Lectures (9)
- Uncategorized (6)
Archives
- March 2023
- July 2022
- April 2022
- December 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- November 2019
- December 2018
- September 2017
- April 2017
- January 2017
- October 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- June 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- January 2008
- June 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- June 2006
- October 2005
- August 2005
- March 2005
- November 2004
- August 2004
- June 2004
- December 2003
- October 2003
- August 2003
- April 2003
- July 2002
- December 2001
- November 2001
- May 2001
- December 2000
- June 2000
- January 1995
- August 1994
- August 1992
- June 1991
- July 1990
- September 1989
- July 1989
- March 1989
Tags
2012 2012 election Benghazi campaign constitution debt debt crisis Democrats economy election 2012 Energy Financial Times fiscal cliff foreign policy Gingrich Global Warming GOP Hoover Digest hughhewitt HughHewitt.com Immigration IRS National Review New York Post New York Times Obama Obamacare Republicans Ricochet Ricochet.com Romney Russia Scandal Senate SOTU speech Supreme Court Syria Tea Party Trump U.S. News Ukraine Wall Street Journal war Washington Times
Dubya’s Drift | New York Post | 10.10.05
WHY, all of a sudden, are things going so wrong for the White House?
Conservatives up in arms about Harriet Miers and about the president’s plans for the Gulf Coast; an anti-war mother camped outside the Crawford ranch dominating the news for a month; Bush’s approval ratings lower than they’ve ever been: This is the price of surrendering control of the agenda.
The white flag went up – and Bush’s troubles began – unnoticed, months ago.
Shortly after his re-election, the president announced he was prepared to spend political capital winning approval for top priorities like Social Security reform and making the 2003 tax cuts permanent.
For months, he looked as good as his word. In a burst of public activity rarely seen in a chief executive except in election years, he hit the campaign trail, telling the American people that Social Security was broken and had to be fixed. Ignoring the problem, he argued, was not an option.
Despite conventional wisdom in our what-have-you-won-for-me-lately national capital, this campaign scored a complete success. From utter complacency at the new year, before long the public was telling pollsters that, yes, indeed, Social Security was a hospital case and the doctor had better be called in quickly.
But, having won the debate on the need for reform, what did the administration do next? Nothing. To date, not one bill or detailed proposal has gone from the White House to Congress.
It is not hard to imagine superficially shrewd reasons for this silence. Some polls showed that reform wasn’t selling well among key GOP groups, in particular red-state men over 50. So it was better for members of Congress to take the first step ‹ let them put proposals on the table and take fire from the liberal media and congressional Democrats, who are seemingly bent on opposing any change in Social Security right up until the money runs out.
But this hang-back-and-let-things-develop approach proved politically obtuse. It hacked away at one of the principal pillars of the president’s popularity especially among Republicans: admiration for his strength.
Time and again in his first term, particularly in his first year, when his political hand was as weak as any president’s in the past three decades, this guy had pushed for his agenda ‹ and in general won more than he gave up.
Yet, on Social Security reform, having teed up a street fight and holding the strongest legislative hand of his presidency , the street fighter went home.
Social Security wasn’t the only battle at which the administration seemed to go AWOL. Even before Katrina, Bush was presiding over the largest spending rise since Lyndon Johnson and had never exercised his veto. With Katrina outlays added in, the coming deficits looked beyond heart stopping.
By not standing up to the spenders (indeed, by seeming to lead with his charge card), the president appeared again to surrender the conservative agenda.
And not only the spending-control agenda. Conservatives saw the administration’s passive acceptance of and participation in soaring spending as making it increasingly unlikely that the tax cuts would become permanent.
Pollster Kellyanne Conway noted at a recent American Spectator dinner that the president’s decline in popularity isn’t mainly among Democrats (how much more disillusioned could they be?) or independents (although he has problems there, too). It is his Republican support that’s dropped from over 90 percent last November to the mid 70s today.
Since mid-year, with no agenda for which he was fighting, the president has given his core supporters little reason to stand by him – and numerous reasons to drift. Around the nation, one hears his backers say they doubt his resolve and even his good faith.
So, with frustration growing ever larger, when he put forward Harriet Miers, many were ready to see, not the shrewd choice of a brilliant woman who had signaled her idea of a first-class justice when she championed John Roberts, but Bush passing on another fight.
Is it too late for the president? Not if he decides to mix it up and return to the battle, to reaffirm his agenda and to wade into the fray. Once the Miers nomination is out of the way – everyone will be too distracted until then anyway – get a Social Security plan in play. Veto some spending. Push for making the tax cuts permanent. Take some chances.
Most of all, remember: To control the agenda in Washington, a president must have an agenda, and he must fight for it.